|
The Arena ((ロシア語:Арена)) is an active protection system (APS) developed at Russia's Kolomna-based Engineering Design Bureau for the purpose of protecting armoured fighting vehicles from destruction by light anti-tank weapons, anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM), and missiles with top attack warheads. It uses a Doppler radar to detect incoming warheads. Upon detection, a defensive rocket is fired that detonates near the inbound threat, destroying it before it hits the vehicle. ''Arena'' is the successor to ''Drozd'', a Soviet active protection system from the late 1970s, which was installed on several T-55s during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. The system improved the vehicle's survivability rate, increasing it by up to 80%. ''Drozd'' was followed by ''Shtora'' in the late 1980s, which used an electro-magnetic jammer to confuse inbound enemy anti-tank missiles and rockets. In late 1994 the Russian Army deployed a large number of armoured fighting vehicles to Chechnya, where they were ambushed and suffered heavy casualties. The effectiveness of Chechen rocket-propelled grenades against Russian combat vehicles prompted the ''Kolomenskoye'' machine-building design bureau to devise the ''Arena'' active protection system in the early and mid-1990s. An export variant, ''Arena-E'', was also developed. The system has been tested on the T-80UM-1, demonstrated at Omsk in 1997, and was considered for use on the South Korean K2 Black Panther main battle tank. ==Background== The Soviet Union developed the first active protection system between 1977 and 1982, named ''Drozd'' (Russian: Дрозд).〔Meyer, p. 8〕〔Kemp, p. 18〕 This system was designed as an alternative to passive or reactive armour, to defend against enemy anti-tank weapons.〔Zaloga (2004), p. 24〕 The system's development was stimulated in large part by the introduction of new high explosive anti-tank warheads. ''Drozd'' was designed to destroy these warheads before they hit the armour of the vehicle being attacked.〔Hazell, p. 116〕 It was composed of three main parts: two launcher arrays placed on either side of the turret and an auxiliary power unit located to the rear of the turret.〔Zaloga (2004), p. 33〕 The arrays were controlled by two millimeter-wave radar antennae. The system used a , cone-shaped fragmentation warhead. ''Drozd'' could protect a tank between the elevations of −6 and 20 degrees along the vertical plane, and between 40 and 60 degrees along the horizontal plane.〔〔Hazell, p. 118〕 Although reported to offer an 80% increase in survival rate during its testing in Afghanistan, the radar was unable to adequately detect threats and the firing of its rockets caused unacceptably high levels of collateral damage.〔 About 250 ''Drozd'' systems were manufactured, all of which were installed on T-55s belonging to the Soviet Union's naval infantry.〔 In the late 1980s, the Soviet Army began development of the ''Shtora''-1 electro-optical jammer.〔 It was first mounted on a T-80U in 1989, and later showcased on a T-72B (renamed T-72BM and later T-90).〔Zaloga (1993), p. 13〕 ''Shtora''-1 is designed to jam incoming anti-tank missiles using a one-kilowatt infrared radiator.〔Zaloga (1993), pp. 13, 34–35〕 In 1995, it was fitted on a Ukrainian T-84. The ''Shtora''-1 system consists of an infra-red radiator interface station, composed of the jammer, modulator and control panel, a number of forward-firing grenade discharges capable of producing a smoke screen, a laser-warning system and a general control panel.〔 ''Shtora'' offers 360 degree all-around protection, between the elevations of −5 and 25 degrees. The system is activated when the laser warning system alerts the tank commander, who responds by pressing a button on his control panel which automatically orients the turret towards the threat. This triggers the grenade launch, creating a smoke screen to reduce the ability of the missile to lock-on the vehicle. The jammers are designed to jam the infra-red seekers on the inbound missiles.〔Meyer, pp. 8–9〕 According to the manufacturers, ''Shtora'' decreases the chances of a tank being hit by an anti-tank missile, such as the Dragon, by a factor of 4–5:1.〔Meyer, p. 9〕 The large number of Russia's casualties during the First Chechen War prompted Russia to consider the development of a new active protection system.〔Geibel (1996), p. 10〕 During the Battle of Grozny, for example, the Russian Army lost between 200 to 250〔Russians claim that they lost between 200 to 250 armoured fighting vehicles, out of 2,221 deployed; Warford, p. 18〕 armoured fighting vehicles to Chechen rebels.〔Rupe, p. 21〕 Vehicles which were knocked-out included main battle tanks such as the T-72 and T-80, and lighter armoured vehicles such as the BMP-2.〔Geibel (1995), p. 13〕 The majority of tanks deployed to Chechnya were not issued with explosive reactive armour, due to the "lack of time and funds", while some of those that were issued with reactive armour did not have the explosive charge to start the reaction.〔Baryantinsky, pp. 58–62〕 Some of the most dangerous threats to Russian armour were rocket-propelled grenades fired from buildings in Grozny.〔Warford, p. 19〕 As a result of these vulnerabilities, ''Kolomenskoye'' developed the ''Arena'' active protection system, with the goal of providing Russian armour more reliable protection against these threats.〔Baryantinsky, p. 72〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Arena (countermeasure)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|